Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): Formula, Calculator, & Stats Guide

13 hours ago
Reads 326

Traditional box scores often fail to capture the true value of a player's scoring efficiency. While a player shooting 50% from the field looks efficient on paper, raw Field Goal Percentage (FG%) makes no distinction between a two-point layup and a three-pointer.

This limitation is precisely why Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) was created. As a foundational advanced basketball stat, eFG% adjusts for the added value of the three-point shot, providing analysts, coaches, and fans with a far more precise measurement of true scoring efficiency.

The Math Behind eFG%: Formula & Breakdown

A three-point basket is worth 50% more points than a two-point basket. The eFG% formula accounts for this difference by adding 0.5 made shots to the numerator for every successful three-pointer.

The eFG% Formula

eFG% = (FGM + (0.5 * 3PM)) / FGA

FGM (Field Goals Made): Total successful shots (2-pointers + 3-pointers).
3PM (3-Point Field Goals Made): Total successful shots from beyond the arc.
FGA (Field Goal Attempts): Total field goals attempted.

Real-World Example: Why Traditional FG% Misleads

To understand why advanced basketball stats rely on eFG%, compare two hypothetical players taking 10 shots in a game:

Metric Player A (Mid-Range / Rim) Player B (Perimeter Specialist)
Field Goal Attempts (FGA) 10 10
2-Point Makes / 3-Point Makes 6 / 0 2 / 3
Total Points Scored 12 13
Traditional FG% 60.0% 50.0%
Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) 60.0% 65.0%

The Takeaway: Player A appears superior under traditional FG% (60% vs. 50%). However, because Player B converted three shots from deep, Player B scored more total points on the exact same number of shot attempts. The eFG% metric correctly identifies Player B as the more efficient scorer.

eFG% vs. True Shooting Percentage (TS%): What's the Difference?

While eFG% is a massive upgrade over traditional field goal percentage, it does not tell the full story of offensive efficiency because it ignores free throws.

Metric Evaluates Ignores
Field Goal % (FG%) 2PT & 3PT Makes Shot Distance & Free Throws
Effective FG% (eFG%) 2PT & 3PT Weighting Free Throws
True Shooting % (TS%) 2PT, 3PT, & Free Throws None

When to use eFG%: When analyzing live-ball shooting performance and floor spacing impact without the distortion of foul calls.

When to use TS%: When evaluating a player's total scoring efficiency, particularly foul-drawers who earn heavy points at the charity stripe (such as James Harden or Joel Embiid).

Benchmark Standards: What Is a "Good" eFG% in the NBA?

Understanding scoring efficiency metrics requires league context. In the modern NBA, shot distribution heavily dictates expected eFG% outcomes:

eFG% Range Efficiency Tier Context & Player Archetype
Under .500 Subpar Below-average efficiency for high-volume scorers; often indicates poor shot selection.
.520 – .540 League Average Standard baseline across all NBA positions.
.550 – .580 Above Average / Elite Guard Excellent efficiency for perimeter players taking high-difficulty shots (e.g., Stephen Curry, Damian Lillard).
.600+ Elite / Rim Finishers Typically achieved by elite rim-runners taking dunks and layups (e.g., Rudy Gobert, Nikola Jokić) or historic shooting seasons.

Historical Context: During Stephen Curry's unanimous MVP season (2015–16), he posted a .630 eFG% while attempting 11.2 three-pointers per game, proving that high volume and high efficiency can coexist at the perimeter level.

TigerScores365 provides a comprehensive look at the sports world with live results, detailed player analytics, and the latest trending news. Browse our website to access a complete database of scores and stats designed to keep every fan fully informed and engaged.

Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): Formula, Calculator, & Stats Guide - NBA News - News