Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%): Formula, Calculator, & Stats Guide
Traditional box scores often fail to capture the true value of a player's scoring efficiency. While a player shooting 50% from the field looks efficient on paper, raw Field Goal Percentage (FG%) makes no distinction between a two-point layup and a three-pointer.
This limitation is precisely why Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) was created. As a foundational advanced basketball stat, eFG% adjusts for the added value of the three-point shot, providing analysts, coaches, and fans with a far more precise measurement of true scoring efficiency.
The Math Behind eFG%: Formula & Breakdown
A three-point basket is worth 50% more points than a two-point basket. The eFG% formula accounts for this difference by adding 0.5 made shots to the numerator for every successful three-pointer.
The eFG% Formula
eFG% = (FGM + (0.5 * 3PM)) / FGA
FGM (Field Goals Made): Total successful shots (2-pointers + 3-pointers).
3PM (3-Point Field Goals Made): Total successful shots from beyond the arc.
FGA (Field Goal Attempts): Total field goals attempted.
Real-World Example: Why Traditional FG% Misleads
To understand why advanced basketball stats rely on eFG%, compare two hypothetical players taking 10 shots in a game:
| Metric | Player A (Mid-Range / Rim) | Player B (Perimeter Specialist) |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goal Attempts (FGA) | 10 | 10 |
| 2-Point Makes / 3-Point Makes | 6 / 0 | 2 / 3 |
| Total Points Scored | 12 | 13 |
| Traditional FG% | 60.0% | 50.0% |
| Effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%) | 60.0% | 65.0% |
The Takeaway: Player A appears superior under traditional FG% (60% vs. 50%). However, because Player B converted three shots from deep, Player B scored more total points on the exact same number of shot attempts. The eFG% metric correctly identifies Player B as the more efficient scorer.
eFG% vs. True Shooting Percentage (TS%): What's the Difference?
While eFG% is a massive upgrade over traditional field goal percentage, it does not tell the full story of offensive efficiency because it ignores free throws.
| Metric | Evaluates | Ignores |
|---|---|---|
| Field Goal % (FG%) | 2PT & 3PT Makes | Shot Distance & Free Throws |
| Effective FG% (eFG%) | 2PT & 3PT Weighting | Free Throws |
| True Shooting % (TS%) | 2PT, 3PT, & Free Throws | None |
When to use eFG%: When analyzing live-ball shooting performance and floor spacing impact without the distortion of foul calls.
When to use TS%: When evaluating a player's total scoring efficiency, particularly foul-drawers who earn heavy points at the charity stripe (such as James Harden or Joel Embiid).
Benchmark Standards: What Is a "Good" eFG% in the NBA?
Understanding scoring efficiency metrics requires league context. In the modern NBA, shot distribution heavily dictates expected eFG% outcomes:
| eFG% Range | Efficiency Tier | Context & Player Archetype |
|---|---|---|
| Under .500 | Subpar | Below-average efficiency for high-volume scorers; often indicates poor shot selection. |
| .520 – .540 | League Average | Standard baseline across all NBA positions. |
| .550 – .580 | Above Average / Elite Guard | Excellent efficiency for perimeter players taking high-difficulty shots (e.g., Stephen Curry, Damian Lillard). |
| .600+ | Elite / Rim Finishers | Typically achieved by elite rim-runners taking dunks and layups (e.g., Rudy Gobert, Nikola Jokić) or historic shooting seasons. |
Historical Context: During Stephen Curry's unanimous MVP season (2015–16), he posted a .630 eFG% while attempting 11.2 three-pointers per game, proving that high volume and high efficiency can coexist at the perimeter level.
TigerScores365 provides a comprehensive look at the sports world with live results, detailed player analytics, and the latest trending news. Browse our website to access a complete database of scores and stats designed to keep every fan fully informed and engaged.



