Huaqiao University delivered a statement performance in the Club Friendship basketball league, defeating Lee Ming Institute of Technology 82-65 on September 24, 2026, at the Huaqiao University Sports Center. The home side controlled the game from the opening tip, using a balanced scoring attack and a disruptive defensive effort to secure a comfortable double-digit win. The final score reflected Huaqiao’s dominance on the boards and their ability to turn defensive stops into quick transition points.

The match, which tipped off at 10:40 local time, was part of the ongoing Club Friendship schedule—a competition that brings together university programs from across the region for high-level friendly competition. With the victory, Huaqiao University strengthens its position in the early standings and sends a clear message to the rest of the league.

Match Overview: Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

Huaqiao set the tone early with aggressive perimeter defense and efficient half-court execution. Lee Ming stayed within striking distance in the first quarter but could not match Huaqiao’s intensity after the first ten minutes. A decisive second-quarter run allowed the hosts to take a double-digit lead into halftime, and they never looked back.

Huaqiao’s largest lead of the game reached 20 points midway through the third quarter. Lee Ming managed a late push in the fourth, cutting the deficit to 12 with just over four minutes remaining, but Huaqiao responded with a clutch three-pointer and a series of free throws to seal the result.

Key Moments That Decided the Game

The contest turned in the second quarter when Huaqiao unleashed a 14-2 run over a three-minute stretch. Senior guard Chen Jiahao ignited the surge with a steal and a fast-break dunk, then followed it with a step-back three from the wing. Lee Ming called timeout, but the momentum had already shifted.

Lee Ming showed resilience with a 10-0 run of their own before halftime, highlighted by back-to-back triples from Huang Wei-Cheng. That burst trimmed the lead to 42-33 at the break, giving the visitors hope. However, Huaqiao opened the third quarter with a 9-2 run, effectively putting the game out of reach.

Another critical moment came with 6:12 left in the fourth quarter. Lee Ming had cut the score to 68-56 and was pressing for a turnover. Huaqiao’s Lin Yuchen calmly drained a contested three-pointer from the corner, pushing the lead back to 15 and deflating the comeback attempt.

Standout Players and Statistical Leaders

Huaqiao’s victory was powered by a complete team effort, with four players scoring in double figures. Chen Jiahao earned Player of the Game honors after finishing with a game-high 24 points, 9 rebounds, 4 assists, and 3 steals. He shot 9-of-15 from the field, including 4-of-7 from beyond the arc.

• Chen Jiahao (Huaqiao): 24 points, 9 rebounds, 4 assists, 3 steals
• Lin Yuchen (Huaqiao): 16 points, 5 three-pointers, 2 assists
• Wang Zihao (Huaqiao): 12 points, 11 rebounds, 3 blocks
• Huang Wei-Cheng (Lee Ming): 18 points, 6 rebounds, 5 assists
• Chen Kuan-Ting (Lee Ming): 14 points, 8 rebounds
• Lin Chih-Hao (Lee Ming): 11 points, 3 steals

For Lee Ming, Huang Wei-Cheng was the primary offensive threat, but he was forced into tough shots by Huaqiao’s rotating defense. The visitors shot just 6-of-28 from three-point range (21.4%) and committed 18 turnovers, which Huaqiao converted into 22 points.

Tactical Story: Defense and Rebounding Win It

Huaqiao head coach Zhang Wei implemented a 1-3-1 zone press that disrupted Lee Ming’s half-court rhythm. The scheme trapped ball handlers on the wings and forced several cross-court passes that Huaqiao intercepted. The hosts finished with 11 steals and consistently pushed the pace after turnovers.

On the glass, Huaqiao dominated with a 44-32 rebounding advantage. Wang Zihao anchored the paint, while Chen Jiahao and Lin Yuchen crashed from the wings. Lee Ming’s frontcourt struggled to box out, allowing Huaqiao numerous second-chance opportunities. The rebounding differential proved to be one of the most significant statistical gaps o